<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ripping off people&#8217;s content is illegal, whatever you think of them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/</link>
	<description>Reflections on work and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:39:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dead Man Walking</title>
		<link>http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/comment-page-1/#comment-120985</link>
		<dc:creator>Dead Man Walking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 11:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/#comment-120985</guid>
		<description>Now the site in question has replaced it with a link to a torrent site. Which - contrary to belief on the sites in question - is still illegal (Incitement).

No doubt the lawyers saw it, and took action, and may take action again.

As for Hannah, I&#039;d be interested to see where she goes from here. She&#039;s managed to get a genuine A-Lister to comment on her blog, something that most bloggers dream of (even us that are nice!), but what now for her?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the site in question has replaced it with a link to a torrent site. Which &#8211; contrary to belief on the sites in question &#8211; is still illegal (Incitement).</p>
<p>No doubt the lawyers saw it, and took action, and may take action again.</p>
<p>As for Hannah, I&#8217;d be interested to see where she goes from here. She&#8217;s managed to get a genuine A-Lister to comment on her blog, something that most bloggers dream of (even us that are nice!), but what now for her?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/comment-page-1/#comment-120831</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 18:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/#comment-120831</guid>
		<description>The person offering the copyrighted 4HWW materials seems to be having problems gaining a foothold after all. After an initial blast onto the scene, he has managed to fall short of all of his promises thus far. He is either over his head, or just irresponsible. No matter which it is, he has done the worst thing possible and disappointed his audience. He garnered lots of attention and then proceeded to lose the trust of the readers. I doubt that site will be around for long.

As for Hannah, well only time will tell if she manages to stick around and make a place for herself in the blogosphere. She&#039;s got one week of posts out there. Now let&#039;s see where week two leads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The person offering the copyrighted 4HWW materials seems to be having problems gaining a foothold after all. After an initial blast onto the scene, he has managed to fall short of all of his promises thus far. He is either over his head, or just irresponsible. No matter which it is, he has done the worst thing possible and disappointed his audience. He garnered lots of attention and then proceeded to lose the trust of the readers. I doubt that site will be around for long.</p>
<p>As for Hannah, well only time will tell if she manages to stick around and make a place for herself in the blogosphere. She&#8217;s got one week of posts out there. Now let&#8217;s see where week two leads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jen</title>
		<link>http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/comment-page-1/#comment-120823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/#comment-120823</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that you could report the copyright violation to Ferriss so he could pursue whatever retribution he thinks is fair.

I hate to see people justifying their illegal actions by claiming some sort of righteous purpose. Civil disobedience has its place in society, but it is not an excuse for this sort of theft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that you could report the copyright violation to Ferriss so he could pursue whatever retribution he thinks is fair.</p>
<p>I hate to see people justifying their illegal actions by claiming some sort of righteous purpose. Civil disobedience has its place in society, but it is not an excuse for this sort of theft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on Baiting For Blogs &#8211; Dead Site</title>
		<link>http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/comment-page-1/#comment-120814</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on Baiting For Blogs &#8211; Dead Site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 16:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andymerrett.co.uk/2008/11/08/ripping-off-peoples-content-is-illegal-whatever-you-think-of-them/#comment-120814</guid>
		<description>[...] all a comment that was actually heavily critical of Darren from a blogger resulted in a couple of posts linking back to said blogger. Maybe I should just make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all a comment that was actually heavily critical of Darren from a blogger resulted in a couple of posts linking back to said blogger. Maybe I should just make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
