New:

Popular:

Conversation:

Hand Picked:

Is Splashpress Media rebranding/regrouping yet again? September 30th, 2011

I’ve had an interesting relationship with Splashpress Media over the years. You may recall that several years ago I was blogging for them, then I supposedly took over running the joint with Scrivs and – err – Franky.

That is until sometime in late 2009/2010 (I can’t remember exactly when it was now, and I can’t be bothered to trawl back through Twitter) when Franky threw one of his hissy fits at the same time as going into overdrive, and told everyone that I (basically) wasn’t up to the job of running SPM.

This was after only a few months. The straw that broke the Franky’s back? It was along the lines of me not writing an article or report over a weekend that I’d been given about ten minute’s notice of.

I always knew that Mr B — after his last blowout when in charge, storm-out-of-Splashpress, leave everyone in the lurch, come back and somehow hold Mark Saunders to ransom a few months later — wanted to be “in control” again, and he got his way.

Yes, apparently my lack of drive meant that the sites weren’t going to progress at an acceptable rate. The flagship acquisition – 9rules – would languish and die, apparently.

So, with me out of the way and the bold Franky in charge, things must be really good at SPM right now?

Of course they are. Let’s take a look.

The first thing I noticed is that I’m still the editor of several titles, like Daily Bits, despite the fact I was struck off around two years ago.

9rules? That must be sparkling, right? Well, the members forum seems to have disappeared. The last “weekly highlights post” was in June 2011. 9rules appears now just to tick along, automatically scraping RSS feeds and doing sod all with them. Community? Yeah.

How about Celebrific, the site that we had big plans for. Now, I’ll admit I’m not really into the celeb scene, and I know it’s quite a tough market to do well in. How’s that doing? It gets one post per day if we’re lucky. Heck, it was doing more than that before we took over!

Forever Geek does look quite healthy. It had a big makeover and it looks good. It has some great writers and perhaps it’s Splashpress Media’s flagship.

Filmsy? More flimsy.

Apple Gazette is being admirably run almost single-handedly by the excellent Robin Parrish. We had also given him Erati to work on, but that too seems to have slipped. I can hardly blame the guy — he looks like one of the few holding together multiple sites and running out of time and energy. That isn’t how it was supposed to be.

So, I must admit to feeling a little sorry for Mel Panabi. He’s been involved with Splashpress in the past, so presumably he has an inkling what he might be letting himself in for as the new community manager:

He has now rejoined us as a full time team member and will be covering a variety of blogs in the tech and entertianment [sic] channels [sic] such as Apple Gazette, 901am, Celebrific and Filmsy. He will also be account manager for our MyBlogGuest profile and responsible for all guest posts on SPM properties.

Mark, I really hope you are paying Mel a decent wage for all that lot.

Splashpress has often been accused of buying properties and running them into the ground. This time, can we hope that things will be different? Will the “A list” SPM blogs be injected with new life? Is the new look network page, with its 6 channels, a blessing or an administrative ball-and-chain?

SPM outlines its own problem (though of course, it’s not labelled a problem) in its announcement of a partnership with ManageWP:

“The entire umbrella of Splashpress Media covers well over 700 blogs so this will a crucial time saver for us!”

While claiming to have 700 blogs may not be factually inaccurate, I wonder how many of those sites are healthy, profiting, spam free entities that an owner would be proud of?

SPM is also planning to launch Forever Geek Forums. Oh yes, I seem to remember we were trying to launch those two years ago.

The only saving grace (until such a time as he returns, which unfortunately seems to be one of those inevitabilities alongside death and taxes) is that Franky appears not to be holding the reins any more. At least, not all of them. Whether Mark still has a puppet-master remains to be seen.

You can read this article as sour grapes if you like. The fact is, I always believed in the potential of Splashpress Media — I’m not in the habit of taking on projects that I can’t see any hope of. The trouble is, the network seems to keep changing direction, jettisoning talent, and spreading itself too thin.

I’d love to see just a handful of SPM sites really excel (At least there’d be more juice flowing to Recipe Finder when they pimp it). Will it happen this time? Let’s watch.

How to get off Netflip.co.uk email spam marketing lists September 8th, 2011

The Problem

If you’ve landed on this page it’s probably because you’ve been bombarded with junk email from a NetFlip.co.uk newsletter.

Chances are you *did* genuinely sign up for something once – perhaps as part of an offer by another company. I’m not going to allege that email addresses accidentally find their way onto Submission Technology’s databases. What seems clear is that once they’re on the database it’s very hard to remove them.

You’ve probably already discovered that clicking on the “unsubscribe” link on each email message does nothing at all. It certainly doesn’t completely remove your email address from their databases, but it doesn’t even remove your address from that particular campaign.

In the past few months things got worse. Not only did I receive several different messages per day from newsletter@netflip.co.uk, but I received multiple copies of the same message. I’ve no idea why, but it was annoying.

Why Bother?

Life is short, it’s true, and some have suggested simply filtering the messages to a junk or bin and forgetting about them.

The trouble is, I work on “principle”. In a world of unlimited broadband, I can’t really argue that they’re stealing my bandwidth — the messages are fairly small and don’t take long to download — although occasionally when I’ve tried to check my messages on a very slow mobile connection, I certainly discover how irritating unsolicited messages are.

There’s a possible issue of privacy, particularly when we seem to be dealing with a company that doesn’t honour requests. It makes little difference to me whether this is a deliberate management decision or simply poorly configured technology — if they can’t get these basics right, what confidence can I have that they’re managing my data responsibly?

The Solution

Disclaimer: I can’t guarantee that the following solution will work for you. You implement this at your own risk, and you shall not hold me liable for any trouble you might get into with Submission Technology, their agents, the police, or anyone else who might take issue with this. There is a slim possibility that you could get into trouble under some section of a communication or electronic communication act/law, as it could constitute harassment. Proceed at your own risk.

Here goes:

1. Gather together email addresses for key staff at Submission Technology (the company that owns and maintains the Netflip.co.uk domain and services).

The easiest way to do that is to visit www.submissiontechnology.co.uk, click on one of the options under the “What We Do” menu, then find the contacts listed on each page linked from the left-hand menu.

Put them in a nice comma separated list (i.e. name1@blah.com, name2@blah.com)

2. In your email software set up a filter or rule. As there are so many email clients, I can’t tell you how to do that for your particular software, but it’s usually fairly easy.

Have the rule look out for any incoming mail that comes from “newsletter@netflip.co.uk”. For now at least, this is where all the spam marketing messages come from (small mercies).

For each match, have your email client forward or redirect (your choice) the message to all of the email addresses you collected earlier. If you can only forward to one address, pick one you fancy. You might want to pick on CEO Neil Durrant. I’ll let you discover his email address yourself (hint: market research).

You’ll need to set up add your own message otherwise it’s a fairly pointless exercise and the ST guys may not take the hint. You can usually append a message to the original before it’s forwarded. I used this:

Hello,

As you have refused to acknowledge my unsubscribe requests and other attempts at contact, you are now being automatically forwarded every piece of (spam) email your NetFlip.co.uk service is sending me.

Annoying isn’t it?

I’ve been receiving multiple copies of multiple messages for well over six months now.

I suggest you work out how to remove all instances of [your email address] from your databases!

Please do not reply to this message. It will be ignored.

Use this, or your own similarly creative message. There’s no call to be threatening (that could really get you into trouble). Do change the [your email address] bit to the email address you’re receiving their spam on.

If you can execute more than one action for each filter, you might also want to move the message to the trash/bin/junk folder so you don’t even have to see it (unless you want the satisfaction of counting how much junk you’ve just sent to the guys who created it)

3. Sit back and wait.

If all goes according to plan you should quickly find those messages disappear. Mine stopped after just two days (at least, I think they’ve stopped).

To Neil Durrant and Submission Technology

Please fix your systems and implement best practices in managing marketing mailing lists. There is no advantage in sending email to people who don’t want it. Please act like a responsible, reputable company. Honour ‘unsubscribe’ requests and there’ll be no need for direct action.

To EConsultancy

I suppose the comments I left on your interview with Neil Durrant were an embarrassment to you and/or your industry as you saw fit to continually censor them.

The fact is, a company in your sector is acting unethically and direct action appears to be the only way of sorting things out. By removing my comments you appear to be condoning their actions.

Future Vigilance

Prevention is better than cure, and you need to try to avoid ‘reinfection’. It can be quite hard to find out what service a company may be using for its mailing list.

Take a look at the front page of netflip.co.uk (no link love for you) and you’ll see:

NetFlip.co.uk is Submission Technology’s mailing service, used by sites like:

FreebieGB
Cashback.co.uk
GreasyPalm
Tiscali Cashback
SomeoneWillWin
Free DVD Nights
The Sun Cashback
News of the World Cashback
GMTV Cashback
SmartSpend

Obviously this list isn’t updated very often because it’s still listing sites like the News of the World. However, given that Submission Technology’s main business appears to be ‘cashback’ sites, you should be extra vigilant if you decide to sign up for those sites.

Be warned that you may automatically be signed up for a newsletter even if you simply register with the site. While I don’t want to suggest that all associated companies are unethical, they may not be aware that Submission Technology is abusing their members by spamming them.

Contacting Other Companies

If you’ve really got the bit between your teeth, you may wish to contact some of the legitimate companies that are being advertised via Netflip/Submission Technology. Bear in mind that much of this marketing spam comes from affiliates not related to the original company, so this could have limited, if any, effect.

For example, I contacted both Optical Express and Nielsen UK — two companies advertised via Netflip emails — to let them know that their services were being spammed in this way. I haven’t heard back from them, and sadly they probably have little power to act. Netflip/ST seem to use affiliates and tend to aggregate these cashback offers, so they don’t have a direct relationship with the original companies.

Did it work for you?

Let me know if this worked for you, or if you have found another method of removing yourself from this pesky marketer’s email lists.

Resources

How to boycott News Corporation July 13th, 2011

The ongoing debacle surrounding the News of the World, News International and News Corporation continues, some may want to withdraw their support for the companies involved.

I’m not wholly convinced that a blanket boycott of all linked companies is the answer, because as we’ve already seen it tends to be journalists and other employees that suffer, not the fat cat owners.

However, as Rupert Murdoch and the like care most about their bank balance, hitting News Corporation where it hurts — by withdrawing custom — may be the only way to do it.

Be under no illusion that it’s extremely difficult to boycott the company and its subsidiaries. News Corp is a powerful, global brand and as such, total avoidance may be impossible. If you’re up for a challenge, here’s how to boycott News Corporation entities.

Cancel your Sky subscription

News Corporation already owns nearly two-fifths of BSkyB and is looking to take a larger stake in the company.

If you can bear to tear yourself away from US films and dramas, sports programming for which Sky plonked down huge amounts of cash, and a host of weird channels, cancel your Sky subscription.

Remove Sky channels from your EPG

Don’t give Sky channels the time of day on whatever other platforms you watch TV.

If you’re a Virgin Media customer, don’t pay for Sky packages.

If you have BT Vision, don’t pay for Sky Sports channels.

If you have Freeview, remove all Sky-owned channels from your EPG (or disable them) so that you don’t inadvertently watch them. This includes the obvious ones such as Sky Sports News and Pick TV (formerly Sky Three), but also includes Challenge TV.

Stop watching ITV

News Corporation owns a minority stake in ITV. While that means it has minimal control over the terrestrial broadcaster, it still profits from the successes of ITV.

If you can tear yourself away from the X Factor and everything else ITV has to offer, go for it.

Stop reading News International titles

The News of the World is dead, but News International (and its subsidiaries) also owns The Sun, The Times, The Sunday Times and The Times Educational Supplement.

Avoid international newspapers

  • Australia published by News Limited.
    • The Australian (Nationwide)
    • Community Media Group (16 QLD & NSW suburban/regional titles)
    • Cumberland-Courier Newspapers (23 suburban/commuter titles)
    • The Courier-Mail (Queensland)
    • The Sunday Mail (Queensland)
    • The Cairns Post (Cairns, Queensland)
    • The Gold Coast Bulletin (Gold Coast, Queensland)
    • The Townsville Bulletin (Townsville, Queensland)
    • The Daily Telegraph (New South Wales)
    • The Sunday Telegraph (New South Wales)
    • Herald Sun (Victoria)
    • Sunday Herald Sun (Victoria)
    • The Weekly Times (Victoria)
    • Leader Newspapers (33 suburban Melbourne, VIC titles)
    • MX (Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane CBD)
    • The Geelong Advertiser (Geelong, Victoria)
    • The Advertiser (South Australia)
    • The Sunday Mail (South Australia)
    • Messenger Newspapers (11 suburban Adelaide, SA titles)
    • The Sunday Times (Western Australia)
    • The Mercury (Tasmania)
    • Quest Newspapers (19 suburban Brisbane, QLD titles)
    • The Sunday Tasmanian (Tasmania)
    • Northern Territory News (Northern Territory)
    • The Sunday Territorian (Northern Territory)
    • The Tablelands Advertiser (Atherton Tablelands and the Far North, Queensland)
  • Fiji
    • Fiji Times (National) (10%)
    • Nai Lalakai (10%)
    • Shanti Dut (10%)
  • Papua New Guinea
    • Papua New Guinea Post-Courier (National) (62.5%)
  • UK and Ireland newspapers, published by subsidiaries of News International Ltd.
    • News Group Newspapers Ltd.
      • The Sun (published in Scotland as The Scottish Sun and in Ireland as The Irish Sun)
    • Times Newspapers Ltd.
      • The Sunday Times
      • The Times
      • The Times Literary Supplement
  • US newspapers and magazines
    • The New York Post
      • Community Newspaper Group
        • The Brooklyn Paper
        • Bronx Times-Reporter
        • Brooklyn Courier-Life
        • Queens Times Ledger
    • Dow Jones & Company
      • Consumer Media Group
        • The Wall Street Journal
        • Wall Street Journal Europe
        • Wall Street Journal Asia
        • Barron’s – weekly financial markets magazine.
        • Marketwatch – Financial news and information website.
        • Far Eastern Economic Review
      • Enterprise Media Group
        • Dow Jones Newswires – global, real-time news and information provider.
        • Factiva – provides business news and information together with content delivery tools and services.
        • Dow Jones Indexes – stock market indexes and indicators, including the Dow Jones Industrial Average.
        • Dow Jones Financial Information Services – produces databases, electronic media, newsletters, conferences, directories, and other information services on specialised markets and industry sectors.
        • Betten Financial News – leading Dutch language financial and economic news service.
      • Local Media Group
        • Ottaway Community Newspapers – 8 daily and 15 weekly regional newspapers.
      • STOXX (33%)- joint venture with Deutsche Boerse and SWG Group for the development and distribution of Dow Jones STOXX indices.
      • Vedomosti (33%) – Russia’s leading financial newspaper (joint venture with Financial Times and Independent Media).
      • SmartMoney
    • The Timesledger Newspapers of Queens, New York:
      • Bayside Times, Whitestone Times, Flushing Times, Fresh Meadows Times, Little Neck Ledger, Jackson Heights Times, Richmond Hill Times, Jamaica Times, Laurelton Times, Queens Village Times, Astoria Times, Forest Hills Ledger, Ridgewood Ledger, Howard Beach Times
    • The Courier-Life Newspapers in Brooklyn
    • The Brooklyn Paper
    • Caribbean Life
    • Times-Herald Record (Middletown, New York)

Avoid News Corp Magazines

  • News America Marketing (Smartsource) (weekly Sunday newspaper coupon insert/website)
  • Australian
    • Alpha Magazine
    • Australian Country Style
    • Australian Golf Digest
    • Australian Good Taste
    • Big League
    • BCME
    • Delicious
    • Donna Hay
    • Fast Fours
    • GQ (Australia)
    • Gardening Australia
    • InsideOut (Aust)
    • Lifestyle Pools
    • Live to Ride
    • Notebook
    • Overlander 4WD
    • Modern Boating
    • Modern Fishing
    • Parents
    • Pure Health
    • Super Food Ideas
    • Truck Australia
    • Truckin’ Life
    • twowheels
    • twowheels scooter
    • Vogue (Australia)
    • Vogue Entertaining & Travel
    • Vogue Living
  • InsideOut (UK Based Magazine)

Avoid News Corporation film studio assets

  • 20th Century Fox
  • Fox Searchlight Pictures
  • 20th Century Fox Home Entertainment
  • Blue Sky Studios
  • 20th Century Fox Español
  • 20th Century Fox International
  • 20th Century Fox Television
  • Fox Studios Australia
  • Fox Studios LA
  • Fox Television Studios
  • Shine Group

Avoid News Corporation broadcast/production assets

  • 20th Century Fox Television
  • 20th Television
  • Foxtel
  • Fox Broadcasting Company
  • Fox International Channels
  • Fox International Channels Italy
  • Fox Sports Australia
  • Fox Telecolombia
  • Fox Television Stations
  • Fox Television Studios
  • Imedi Media Holding
  • Latvijas Neatkarīgā Televīzija
  • MyNetworkTV
  • STAR TV
  • TV5 Rīga

Avoid News Corporation owned book companies

The following book companies are subsidiaries of News Corporation:

  • HarperCollins
  • HarperCollins India (40% share)
  • Zondervan
  • Inspiro (gifts)

Avoid News Corporation Internet Companies

News Corporation has influence on a number of Internet media entities including:

  • Foxsports.com
  • Hulu
  • IGN Entertainment (IGN, GameSpy, TeamXBox, AskMen.com)
  • Flektor online photo editing service
  • News.com.au
  • PropertyFinder.com

Avoid Other Subsidiary Companies

News International owns a number of subsidiary companies including:

  • News International (Advertisements) Limited
  • News International Associated Services Limited
  • News International Distribution Limited
  • News Printers (Knowsley) Limited
  • News Printers (Scotland) Limited
  • News International Pension Trustees Limited
  • News International Supply Company Limited
  • News International Television Investment Company Limited
  • News International Television Limited
  • NI Syndication Limited

Avoid Other News Corporation Wholly- and Part-Owned Companies and Assets

Wikipedia lists a huge number of other companies influenced by News Corporation, including assets.

Conclusion

Do you see how difficult it is to completely eradicated News Corporation? It seems clear that News Corp’s TV and Internet businesses are the most profitable so this may be the first place to direct a boycott.

However, ordinary, decent employees shouldn’t have to suffer because of the abhorrent, criminal activities of a few high-level managers and rogue staff.

Public wants, public gets, public revolts, public forgets July 9th, 2011

The News of the World scandal has rightly caused public outcry, but should we really be surprised?

Whether we choose to admit it or not, or individually attempt to dissociate ourselves with “the public at large”, it’s a fact that tabloids (in particular) only publish what the masses want to read.

One might try to argue (badly) that — much like the mountain that has to be climbed because it’s there — people only read the salacious celebrity gossip and other trash reporting synonymous with these newspapers because that’s what they provide.

Unfortunately, that position just doesn’t wash. The public (in general) want to know about the private lives of the rich and famous. Though papers like the News of the World like to claim that they broke some important stories — and in fact, throughout their history, that is true — the fact is their mainstay is gossip and tittle-tattle.

The public wants, and the public gets.

As the debate surrounding the role, rights and responsibilities of the media continues, some comments speak volumes about the murky world of tabloid journalism.

In a BBC Newsnight interview, the News of the World’s Deputy Features Editor (1994-2001), Paul McMullan, said, “I’ve always tried to write articles in a truthful way, and what better source of getting the truth is to listen to someone’s messages.”

It’s not difficult for a reasonable person to see a difference between pursuing a celebrity and hacking the phones of ordinary men and women (particularly those experiencing personal tragedy). Yet it takes a certain type of person to overstep the line from public to private when pursuing a story.

Though we are rightly abhorred that journalists and private investigators hacked the voicemail of Milly Dowler, 7/7 victims and the families of dead soldiers, why should be surprised that people willing to point an 800mm lens towards someone’s bedroom to scoop a photo might have gutter morals?

Not all journalists are bad. Most are very good. Some sully the profession and, hopefully, will be properly dealt with.

Last week there was a call for a boycott of the News of the World. Now we know that tomorrow’s edition will be its last, there are predictions for record sales.

If the Sun on Sunday materialises, as many believe it will, it’s likely to be picked up by most of NoW’s current readership. Yet The Sun hardly has an exemplary record.

The public revolts. The public forgets.

The next bit of hard-hitting gossip and in-depth reportage of scandal will have a majority of the populous glued to the tabloids again.

Of course, many of us will not forget. And we’ll continue to put pressure on the media, the politicians and the police until things improve.

“All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” Edmund Burke.

Only when the public at large decides it’s not interested in the tabloids’ current fare will we see a change in what editors deem to be in the public interest.

News of the World: journalists, fat cats, police and politicians July 8th, 2011

Britain’s media, police and political systems are in a real mess thanks in part to the actions of the News of the World.

For all the rhetoric spouted by senior figures at the News of the World and its parent company, News International, it is ordinary men, women and children who suffer.

Not content with illegally tapping the phones of British soldiers killed on active service, victims of terrorism, and murdered teenagers, or allowing journalists and private investigators to cosy up to politicians and bribe/blackmail police officers — allegedly — the the powers-that-be at News International are now happy to put hundreds of decent journos and workers at News of the World out of a job.

Mr James Murdoch and Ms Rebekah Brooks (among others) should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. Perhaps, as Andy Coulson has just discovered, the police will be knocking on their doors in the near future — though I doubt it.

Closing down the News of the World is a token gesture, albeit one tinged with an implicit admission of guilt, which means nothing to anyone but its employees. The Sun (another deplorable tabloid) will simply take its place on Sunday, while News International shifts its attention to taking over BSkyB and monopolising British media.

Police, politicians and media now face difficult times ahead as the trio try to disentangle themselves from one another. And all three establishments have been tarnished. Which individuals and organisations survive, and which will be irrevocably damaged, remains to be seen.

Let’s not be naive here. The News of the World is not the only media outlet to have broken the law. Both tabloid and broadsheet papers have used some dodgy methods to get a story.

Many issues need to be debated in the weeks ahead. How closely should the media get to politicians and the police? How much control should government have over the British press? When is it acceptable, if ever, for the media to break the law to scoop a story? Which stories are public interest and which should remain private?

There has been understandable public outcry over the phone hacking scandals alleged to have been undertaken by the News of the World. It will be interesting to see how this develops over the next few months as police investigations and independent enquiries continue and publish their findings.

I remember the public anger towards paparazzi-style journalists following the death of Princess Diana, with some suggesting that they shouldn’t be allowed to report on her funeral.

There have been plenty of other appalling stories peddled by tabloid newspapers over the years, but in the main they only publish what sells. Public outcry and boycotts are all well and good, but typically they don’t last for long. If they did, titles such as the News of the World, The Sun, The Daily Express and The Daily Mail would fold.

I don’t see the great British public changing its reading or viewing habits. As much as people might like to see the Murdoch empire crumble, they’ll continue to pay their money for a Sky dish in order to be first to watch crappy American drama and overpaid footballers, and get their fix of celebrity trash talk from the tabloids.

Who’s laughing the loudest now? Listen carefully and you may just hear Jimmy and Rupert. They’re immune from reprisals, and now they’ve done their public duty in telling everyone how appalled they are by the scandal they can continue growing their business and raking in the cash.

Knee-jerk DDOS attacks hurt innocents, miss real reasons December 8th, 2010

It seems the hateful geeks are out in force again. Having momentarily shifted their attention from targeting American and British music companies, because they believe copyright to be an outdated concept, they have now set their army of PCs against the websites of Swiss bank PostFinance and PayPal.

It seems no organisation is safe from this army of nerds, regardless of the actual reasoning behind the decisions they disagree with.

PostFinance closed Wikileaks founder Julian Assange’s bank account because he provided false residency information when he opened it.

Yet, the DDOS (distributed denial of service) brigade see this as an affront on freedom of speech, and react in the only way they know how. Attempting to take down the web sites of large institutions by overloading their web servers.

It’s worked with PostFinance, meaning thousands if not millions of innocent customers now cannot access their accounts online, nor find out about the bank’s services.

It doesn’t appear to have worked (yet) with PayPal, though the site is responding rather slowly. Taking that down will hurt millions of people, both individuals and businesses, who rely on the payment service for sending and receiving money.

Yet the people behind “Anon Operation” and other groups who organise and sanction these attacks have little regard for anyone but themselves and the one misguided cause they currently champion.

It’s why governments and big businesses alike must continue to find ways of fighting mass attacks on our Internet infrastructure. Given how easy it is for otherwise benign individuals to club together to sport online anarchy, just think how bad a cyberattack from a rogue state or terrorist organisation would be.

Regardless of what you think of the current Wikileaks situation, taking down large chunks of the Internet is not the answer.

Return to blogging… August 27th, 2010

Subscribers to this blog will probably have noticed an absence of posts over the the past year: one last month, one the month before… and then nothing since August last year!

There are many reasons for this. I continue to write, though often less personally, in a number of different places and so my personal blog has been neglected.

In addition, I’ve been using Twitter and Facebook updates a lot more, and I really haven’t dedicated any time to writing in detail (more than 140 characters at a time) about the things that matter to me.

Paul Carr writes a thought-provoking piece at TechCrunch titled The Rise of Microblogging, the Death of Posterity that hit home that last reason.

To that end, I have decided to dedicate a little more time to my personal blog. This won’t be to the detriment of my other projects, and I don’t plan to post religiously or über-regularly, but I do expect to blog at least once a week from now on.

We’ll see how it goes.

Blue Fish Photography: My new web site launches today July 7th, 2010

I am very pleased to announce the launch of the Blue Fish Photography web site, which showcases a range of my photography and allows you to purchase it online.

My main areas of photographic interest are around nature, landscape, urban and cityscape, human interest, texture and abstract.

Please take a look and be sure to check out the Facebook page too.

NICE alcohol recommendations simply hurts responsible drinkers June 2nd, 2010

beer bottlesNICE continues to fuel the ridiculous notion that putting up the price of alcohol will stop binge drinking and alcohol misuse.

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence suggests that heavily taxing alcohol will help to reduce the British culture of over-drinking, but I’m far from convinced.

What will happen is that those who want to drink large amounts of alcohol will simply spend more — just as those who are determined to smoke cigarettes do — while those who drink moderately will suffer by paying higher prices in pubs, supermarkets and other establishments selling alcohol.

It’s the same stupidity that suggests to confectionery and snack manufacturers that they reduce the size of their products in a bid to cut obesity.

It doesn’t work!

Now, I am against the deliberate selling of alcohol as loss-leaders, or prolonged happy hours, because they set the cost of alcohol artificially low. However, adding vast amounts of tax to each equivalent unit of alcohol hurts everyone.

Tackling our destructive alcohol culture will take so much more than price changes. It requires education from an early age in how to consume alcohol sensibly, plus sensible management by all those involved in selling alcohol.

Follow me: Technology Channel at Splashpress Media August 6th, 2009

spm-technologyI’ve been writing on a couple of blogs at Splashpress Media for several years now, but since the demise of Shiny Media (albeit a seemingly short one) I’ve become a lot more involved.

I am now officially the Technology Channel editor, which means I get to write about tech, gadgets, gizmos, web sites and other geeky things, as well as boss a few select writers around a bit from time to time.

It helps that I absolutely love the sites.

If you’ve even slightly been missing my ramblings about high definition TV, the iPhone and general consumer tech, you’ll find a similar blend of regular writings over at ForeverGeek, Gadzooki and GeeksBlog. I’ll also be popping up from time to time on Have Laptop Will Travel, My Asus Eee and IT Security Blog.

More into blogging and new media? You’ll find my news and feature articles at Blog Herald, 901am and Performancing.

All of our blogs and writers are stars. Some have a larger following than others but we’re a friendly crowd (usually — the odd bit of ‘snark’ pops up from time to time) and we’re definitely worth a visit.

Add the whole channel to your RSS feed reader (go on) or visit each site to grab the individual feed.

« Previous Entries