New:

Popular:

Conversation:

Hand Picked:

How to get off Netflip.co.uk email spam marketing lists September 8th, 2011

The Problem

If you’ve landed on this page it’s probably because you’ve been bombarded with junk email from a NetFlip.co.uk newsletter.

Chances are you *did* genuinely sign up for something once – perhaps as part of an offer by another company. I’m not going to allege that email addresses accidentally find their way onto Submission Technology’s databases. What seems clear is that once they’re on the database it’s very hard to remove them.

You’ve probably already discovered that clicking on the “unsubscribe” link on each email message does nothing at all. It certainly doesn’t completely remove your email address from their databases, but it doesn’t even remove your address from that particular campaign.

In the past few months things got worse. Not only did I receive several different messages per day from newsletter@netflip.co.uk, but I received multiple copies of the same message. I’ve no idea why, but it was annoying.

Why Bother?

Life is short, it’s true, and some have suggested simply filtering the messages to a junk or bin and forgetting about them.

The trouble is, I work on “principle”. In a world of unlimited broadband, I can’t really argue that they’re stealing my bandwidth — the messages are fairly small and don’t take long to download — although occasionally when I’ve tried to check my messages on a very slow mobile connection, I certainly discover how irritating unsolicited messages are.

There’s a possible issue of privacy, particularly when we seem to be dealing with a company that doesn’t honour requests. It makes little difference to me whether this is a deliberate management decision or simply poorly configured technology — if they can’t get these basics right, what confidence can I have that they’re managing my data responsibly?

The Solution

Disclaimer: I can’t guarantee that the following solution will work for you. You implement this at your own risk, and you shall not hold me liable for any trouble you might get into with Submission Technology, their agents, the police, or anyone else who might take issue with this. There is a slim possibility that you could get into trouble under some section of a communication or electronic communication act/law, as it could constitute harassment. Proceed at your own risk.

Here goes:

1. Gather together email addresses for key staff at Submission Technology (the company that owns and maintains the Netflip.co.uk domain and services).

The easiest way to do that is to visit www.submissiontechnology.co.uk, click on one of the options under the “What We Do” menu, then find the contacts listed on each page linked from the left-hand menu.

Put them in a nice comma separated list (i.e. name1@blah.com, name2@blah.com)

2. In your email software set up a filter or rule. As there are so many email clients, I can’t tell you how to do that for your particular software, but it’s usually fairly easy.

Have the rule look out for any incoming mail that comes from “newsletter@netflip.co.uk”. For now at least, this is where all the spam marketing messages come from (small mercies).

For each match, have your email client forward or redirect (your choice) the message to all of the email addresses you collected earlier. If you can only forward to one address, pick one you fancy. You might want to pick on CEO Neil Durrant. I’ll let you discover his email address yourself (hint: market research).

You’ll need to set up add your own message otherwise it’s a fairly pointless exercise and the ST guys may not take the hint. You can usually append a message to the original before it’s forwarded. I used this:

Hello,

As you have refused to acknowledge my unsubscribe requests and other attempts at contact, you are now being automatically forwarded every piece of (spam) email your NetFlip.co.uk service is sending me.

Annoying isn’t it?

I’ve been receiving multiple copies of multiple messages for well over six months now.

I suggest you work out how to remove all instances of [your email address] from your databases!

Please do not reply to this message. It will be ignored.

Use this, or your own similarly creative message. There’s no call to be threatening (that could really get you into trouble). Do change the [your email address] bit to the email address you’re receiving their spam on.

If you can execute more than one action for each filter, you might also want to move the message to the trash/bin/junk folder so you don’t even have to see it (unless you want the satisfaction of counting how much junk you’ve just sent to the guys who created it)

3. Sit back and wait.

If all goes according to plan you should quickly find those messages disappear. Mine stopped after just two days (at least, I think they’ve stopped).

To Neil Durrant and Submission Technology

Please fix your systems and implement best practices in managing marketing mailing lists. There is no advantage in sending email to people who don’t want it. Please act like a responsible, reputable company. Honour ‘unsubscribe’ requests and there’ll be no need for direct action.

To EConsultancy

I suppose the comments I left on your interview with Neil Durrant were an embarrassment to you and/or your industry as you saw fit to continually censor them.

The fact is, a company in your sector is acting unethically and direct action appears to be the only way of sorting things out. By removing my comments you appear to be condoning their actions.

Future Vigilance

Prevention is better than cure, and you need to try to avoid ‘reinfection’. It can be quite hard to find out what service a company may be using for its mailing list.

Take a look at the front page of netflip.co.uk (no link love for you) and you’ll see:

NetFlip.co.uk is Submission Technology’s mailing service, used by sites like:

FreebieGB
Cashback.co.uk
GreasyPalm
Tiscali Cashback
SomeoneWillWin
Free DVD Nights
The Sun Cashback
News of the World Cashback
GMTV Cashback
SmartSpend

Obviously this list isn’t updated very often because it’s still listing sites like the News of the World. However, given that Submission Technology’s main business appears to be ‘cashback’ sites, you should be extra vigilant if you decide to sign up for those sites.

Be warned that you may automatically be signed up for a newsletter even if you simply register with the site. While I don’t want to suggest that all associated companies are unethical, they may not be aware that Submission Technology is abusing their members by spamming them.

Contacting Other Companies

If you’ve really got the bit between your teeth, you may wish to contact some of the legitimate companies that are being advertised via Netflip/Submission Technology. Bear in mind that much of this marketing spam comes from affiliates not related to the original company, so this could have limited, if any, effect.

For example, I contacted both Optical Express and Nielsen UK — two companies advertised via Netflip emails — to let them know that their services were being spammed in this way. I haven’t heard back from them, and sadly they probably have little power to act. Netflip/ST seem to use affiliates and tend to aggregate these cashback offers, so they don’t have a direct relationship with the original companies.

Did it work for you?

Let me know if this worked for you, or if you have found another method of removing yourself from this pesky marketer’s email lists.

Resources

Video: Google ranking of AdWords advertisers March 13th, 2009

Here’s a useful video explaining how Google ranks advertisers using the AdWords system. [Via]

Contextual and sidebar ads: a double-edged sword November 8th, 2008

One thing that’s become apparent from the recent attack on Darren is that contextual ads, and others close to content, can be interpreted as being endorsed by the web site owner.

One of Hannah’s criticisms of ProBlogger is that it contains ads with titles like “Easiest Money Ever”. In fact, that is true — that particular ad is for TextLinkAds.com, a link-selling service.

When Hannah visited this blog, she noted that there were “adult links” in the header. Since I don’t explicitly accept or link to “adult” themed web sites, I can only assume that this is something that slipped through the net with Google AdSense, should the accusation in fact be true.

The fact is, choosing to carry nearly any type of advertising on a web site is a risky business. If you use contextual links, there’s a chance it’ll throw up something undesirable to you or your readers. If you accept paid advertising for banner or other graphical ads, but do so through a third-party agency, there’s no guarantee that you’ll get exactly the sort of content you or your readers find acceptable. Even large media organisations have been caught out on this one, when they’ve pushed out the placement of adverts to external agencies. Read the rest of this entry »

Google AdSense has me stuck in a loop! February 25th, 2008

Logging into Google AdSense tonight, I find myself needing to read and accept some new terms and conditions.

Seeing an option to “Remind me the next time I log in. (You must accept the above Terms and Conditions by 25 May 2008, or you will no longer be able to login to AdSense and make changes to your Account.)” I plump for that so I can check some stats before going to bed.

Cycles back to the log in screen and then reloads the Terms and Conditions.

Well, I’m not going to click on “No, I do not accept the above Terms and Conditions.” just in case I’m frozen out.

So I take a cursory look at the T&Cs, hoping that Google isn’t going to do something nasty because I haven’t read all the small print, and submit again.

Still locked in a loop.

Maybe because AdSense tends to log me in automatically, there’s some part of the acceptance process that’s not being completed. Whatever the problem, I can’t get past the Terms and Conditions page.

Hopefully it’ll get fixed soon enough.

Update: Oh well, that was quick!

The Perfume Shop complains about BBC digital radio ads. Needs to get life. December 19th, 2007

The BBC has recently started running some seasonal adverts encouraging viewers to buy a DAB digital radio for Christmas, instead of unwanted gifts such as naff perfume or nasty jumpers.

It seems that UK-based “The Perfume Shop” has taken great offence at these humorous ads, to the point that they’re lodging an official complaint to determine whether the BBC’s guidelines have been broken. Oh, and they’ve written to the BBC’s DG, Mark Thompson.

Jeremy Seigal, Managing Director of The Perfume Shop, said, ““The BBC should not be trying to influence what people buy at Christmas solely to promote and protect its own broadcasting future. Their message that aftershave is not a ‘goodÂ’ present is wrong. Each Christmas we sell over one million bottles of aftershave but sadly, our advertising budgets will never be able to match the massive impact of the thousands of ‘freeÂ’ adverts so far run by the BBC.”

Oh, look, the Fragrance Foundation aren’t happy either.

John Ayres, Chairman of The Fragrance Foundation UK said, “This is irresponsible advertising by the BBC. With all the economic forecasters pointing to a poor Christmas and this holiday season being the most important trading time for retailers and fragrances in particular, the BBC should be promoting their own services rather than attempting to deprive other companies of Christmas sales. If the BBC was a more commercial operation and accepted advertising on its stations, it might be a little more careful whom it chose to offend!”

To all you smelly companies, I say, “Please get a life”.

While I don’t agree with masking truly and grossly offensive content in humour, this is supposed to be a gentle poke at the stereotypical “bad present”, which is now fully ingrained in British folklore.

It’s not the first time the BBC has been criticised for covert advertising, but I think that’s a slightly different issue. Buying a DAB radio will allow people to listen to both BBC and commercial radio stations. Perhaps perfumeries would consider taking out cost-effective advertising on the IBA network?

The BBC encourage people to buy “cheaper” DAB radios. Surely there’s enough room in someone’s budget to give other presents too? If that includes aftershave, socks, and bad jumpers then so be it.

Quite honestly, I think the whole argument is petty, and by making such a fuss you’ve actually discouraged me from buying any of your products.

Take a look in the mirror at your phrase, and make it work for you:

“If the [Perfume Shop] must advertise, then possibly it should stick to promoting its own [products] rather than [sending out] negative messages about [national broadcasters]?””

After all, by sending out this press release and making a fuss, you’re presumably trying to get some free publicity. Yes? Just a shame it makes you look stupid.

inKline Global taking lessons from Domain Registry of America May 14th, 2007

I think inKline Global, who make (amongst other things) the PC Booster software for the PC, has been taking “customer support” lessons from the Domain Registry of America.

I was intrigued and perplexed as to why inKline Global were taking out targeted banner advertisements for their PC Booster software, and yet not filtering out Mac users. I’ve seen a number of banners stating that “my Mac has poor performance”, and when I was intrigued enough to click on one, I was offered a PC-only piece of software, even though the sales page on the web site still referred to my Mac!

I emailed them, from interest only, just to see if they were aware that they were wasting money on poorly targeted ads:

Why do you advertise to Mac owners?

Your FAQ says categorically:

“Does PC Booster run on Macintosh?

PC Booster does not run on Macintosh.”

So why do you run loads of stupid banner ads saying “Your Mac may need a tune up”?

It’s wasted advertising and it’s annoying! If you only make PC software, you should abandon contextual advertising to anyone NOT on a PC!

Now I don’t care what this company does with their money – but I enjoy sending pesky letters from time to time, just for the fun of it.

Here’s the response I received this morning, via email, from the lovely Trisha:

Dear Andy,

Currently PC Booster is not compatible with Macintosh. Once we have a compatible Mac- product, we will notify you through our newsletter.

Have a nice day.

Oh I will have a nice day, safe in the knowledge that I haven’t wasted money with a company that doesn’t bother to read their support emails properly. Had she done this, she would have seen me reference the very answer stating that they don’t make the software for Macs!

Oh, and you had better not notify me through your newsletter, as I’ve never signed up for it. I do hope you haven’t subscribed me to it.

Come on, companies, sort it out.

How many times are you going to rename London's 102.2FM radio? April 20th, 2007

First it was Jazz FM.

Then it was Smooth FM.

Then (I think) it went back to Jazz FM. Though I might be wrong.

Now, it’s Smooth Radio.

The only thing that hasn’t changed is the frequency: 102.2FM.

I presume since they tend to play less jazz now, that “Jazz FM” could’ve been done under the Trade Description Act.

Poor online ad targeting recommends PC software for my Mac April 10th, 2007

Contextual online advertising has a lot of potential, but looks stupid when very basic errors are made.

Take the following banner ad I found on a site the other day:

ad1.gif

It reads: “There is 1 update available for your computer: Your Mac may need a tune up. Click ‘Start’ to recommend improvements”

After clicking the ad, and enduring some tacky progress bar animation that simply puts another barrier between the advertiser and a potential customer, I’m greeted with a screen that again confirms to me that I’m using a Mac with Netscape Navigator version 5. (Well, one out of two’s not bad)

I’m then offered: “Tune Up and Accelerate Your PC Speed in 2 Minutes”

Hang on, I thought you said I had a Mac?

ad2.gif

Yes, apparently, PC Booster will give ‘more speed and stability out of your Windows computer’.

Great.

This is targeting gone wrong. If I’ve got a Mac, then I don’t need no stinkin’ PC optimisation software, do I?

C’mon inKline, that’s a real waste of your advertising dollar.